This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. For the two bugs. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Yes. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. Ventoy is a tool to create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. Assert efi error status invalid parameter Smartadm.ru OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. @pbatard In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. I don't remember if the shortcut is ctrl i or ctrl r for grub mode. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Option 2 will be the default option. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Level 1. to your account, Hello It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. Some known process are as follows:
Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! In this case, try renaming the efi folder as efixxx, and then see if you get a legacy boot option. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Tried it yesterday. try 1.0.09 beta1? Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. You signed in with another tab or window. If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it? I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Tested on 1.0.77. I have the same error with EndeavorOS_Atlantis_neo_21_5.iso using ventoy 1.0.70. the EndeavorOS iso boots with no issues when on it's on usb, but not through ventoy. No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. A Multiboot Linux USB for PC Repair | Page 135 - GBAtemp.net ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Ventoy doesn't load the kernel directly inside the ISO file(e.g. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. to your account. What exactly is the problem? By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===>
6. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. memz.mp4. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' @pbatard 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. Please follow the guid bellow. If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. all give ERROR on my PC That is the point. On one of my Laptop Problem with HBCD_PE_x64.iso Uefi on start from Desktop error with Autoit v3: Pintool.exe Application error. Sorry for my ignorance. Help !!!!!!! It . Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. So I apologise for that. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Click Bootable > Load Boot File. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. ParagonMounter
your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. etc. I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Is there any progress about secure boot support? Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. All of these security things are there to mitigate risks. Well occasionally send you account related emails. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. legacy - ok @chromer030 hello. Edit ISO - no UEFI - forums.ventoy.net Format NTFS in Windows: format x: /fs:ntfs /q
But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. There are many suggestion to use tools which make an ISO bootable with UEFI on a flash disk, however it's not that easy as you can only do that with UEFI-enabled ISO's. By UEFI enabled ISO's I mean that the ISO files contain a BOOT\EFI directory with a EFI bootloader. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. You are receiving this because you commented. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken.