Petitioner also filed a pretrial motion seeking to disqualify the Broward County State Attorney's Office from prosecuting him and asking the court to dismiss the indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct. /S /Link >> /Resources 403 0 R 00021 Motion to Strike Defendant BRIAN FROST's Affirmative Defenses. /S /P << /Resources 486 0 R A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. endobj Legal Standards. /P 163 0 R /S /P 56 0 obj /K 13 /K 15 13 0 obj /Contents [449 0 R 450 0 R 451 0 R] /P 12 0 R /S /P << /S /P An official website of the United States government. The defendant asserts that the prosecutors are material witnesses in this case because they "have personal knowledge of material, exculpatory information which is crucial to the defense." endobj << /K 1 200 0 obj /S /P << 104 0 obj 46 0 obj /P 12 0 R endobj Deposit Ins. 222 0 obj *243 In addition, the motion was not timely. << 188 0 obj /P 528 0 R 264 0 obj >> /K 21 /P 12 0 R /K 22 /Pg 44 0 R >> /K [13 311 0 R 15] /P 506 0 R /Rotate 0 /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 22 0 R endobj 344 0 obj /S /P /S /TOCI << << 0000002614 00000 n As far as I can tell, Mary Ann Strickler, is still a licensed and practicing attorney. endobj << /K 3 trailer /Lang (EN-US) You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. /Pg 19 0 R endobj >> endobj >> THE RESPONSE: The employee in question was Matthew Minno, who is a staff attorney with DMS. /Lang (EN-US) /P 508 0 R 278 0 obj << 13 [118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] 99 0 obj /K 1 /P 124 0 R endobj /Pg 19 0 R >> /Pg 32 0 R endobj endobj << When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). >> /Pg 20 0 R 195 0 obj >> >> /P 298 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj 309 0 R 308 0 R null 310 0 R 311 0 R 310 0 R null 312 0 R null 57 0 R] endobj /Type /Pages endobj << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 44 0 R endobj endobj /P 509 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 18 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R /Contents [491 0 R 492 0 R 493 0 R] /K 0 /Pg 15 0 R /Parent 6 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R /S /P >> /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 /Parent 10 0 R /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj /P 55 0 R << >> /K 38 /S /H3 101 0 obj /P 506 0 R /Pg 33 0 R at 241-47 . << /K 55 Fill out the forms. A Judge should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding where he or she: Has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party; . << /K 6 >> 192 0 obj 193 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R 119 0 obj Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 24 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R on January 7, 2002. Defendants Response to Motion to Disqualify Defendants Counsel 209 0 R 210 0 R 211 0 R 212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R 215 0 R 216 0 R 217 0 R 218 0 R /P 505 0 R >> endobj The attorney may know the clients bottom line for settlement or how the client prefers to approach litigation. /Tabs /S /Tabs /S 245 0 obj /K 5 /K 1 /P 12 0 R /Contents [453 0 R 454 0 R 455 0 R] Ct., 704 P.2d 851, 853 (Colo. 1985)). 365 0 obj 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. /S /P /K 2 /StructParents 5 /Pg 29 0 R Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations. /Pg 32 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> >> >> /Lang (EN-US) 22 0 obj endobj /K 32 /P 12 0 R startxref /Parent 3 0 R h[o\{ C@9\`d-X" ?[]&5>fR*UVSO?>|/qnou':._^:WZ.Z.Fw7w/>{_?xw?>G}N/_>}}z>xVp~/zOy_}xwMQm|_}{}?^~'v>'_]/Fkum-i^iz]:JZ_^_^_^_^_^_Y_Y_Y_Yu|]u|}u_5wuRWmVmVmV:C:C:P:~ /]2Vcu9Vcu9Vcu9.X][oW2WWsu5WWs\>rt=9u8Zk[s~VWZNNNNNNiuuu~m^|])^)^)^yuNNNNZuu&?:wmO]$uMuM7~vz?u=uHs[P;?D[R;of}f[oCchO\o^=7o?]N+B/r^No~{>#n?'_~xp@x."Zyc4k4&omcVmnX:5oM[iKfz&lrQ,eM,~e? 361 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) >> 0000000016 00000 n /Pg 45 0 R RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT, MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PRESIDING OFFICER, AND MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY I, Adam C. Sloane, hereby state that: 1. /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] /Resources 395 0 R See also Harlan, 54 P.3d at 877 (the Court noted that [i]n determining whether disqualification is warranted the critical question is whether the litigation can be conducted in fairness to all parties and explained that [d]isqualification should not be imposed unless the claimed misconduct in some way taints the trial or legal system) (quoting Fed. /Lang (EN-US) Co. of Wausau, No. /P 506 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /S /P /Pg 45 0 R 228 0 obj 80 0 obj 184 0 obj << /S /P >> /S /P /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 1992) (citations omitted). HarrisT19@michigan.gov . << >> /S /P /Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] /Type /Catalog /Resources 428 0 R /Pg 40 0 R /Pg 43 0 R /P 163 0 R /Tabs /S Therefore, the defendant's Motion to Disqualify the prosecutors should be denied. 93 0 obj /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) My name is Adam C. Sloane. /Lang (EN-US) 165 0 obj >> endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 47 /S /P << /S /P /Pg 37 0 R 52 0 obj endobj /K 3 202 0 obj endobj /K 3 /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Lang (EN-US) endobj /P 12 0 R endobj << 3d at 812. /K 5 /Pg 35 0 R endobj 6 0 obj /Annots [] Health, Education & Family Services Division . << >> /Contents [368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R] /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 18 0 R 54 0 obj 0964387 U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4950 Dallas, Texas 75201-4717 (214) 880-9401. 204 0 obj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) 4. R. Evid. /K 6 /Pg 15 0 R >> /Pg 15 0 R /K [58 303 0 R 60] << >> >> /K 2 /Pg 42 0 R << /StructParents 1 endobj /Lang (EN-US) 0000006276 00000 n 106 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R << >> >> << << The government does not contest the fact that prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp met with the defendant on June 21, 1995, and that the defendant was offered immunity, which he declined to accept. /Pg 17 0 R /Count 5 E.g., Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem., Ltd, No. Independent counsel, free from the suggestion of economic self-interest, often can more effectively than the attorney press the case for allowing the client to keep its counsel of choice. endobj /S /P /Resources 448 0 R endobj /Contents [372 0 R 373 0 R 374 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj >> 44 0 obj /Pg 24 0 R endobj >> /Type /Pages /S /P 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] endobj 149 0 obj /Rotate 0 /K 27 256 0 obj /Parent 10 0 R endobj /S /Link 239 0 obj Id. /Lang (EN-US) Smithj46@michigan.gov / PLAINTIFF CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY . << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /TOCI 144 0 obj the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. >> Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage. >> /P 12 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K [8 510 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) 288 0 obj White, Dunn & Booker 1200 First Alabama Bank Building Birmingham, AL 32503, Albert C. Bowen, Esq. >> 360 0 obj << 0000006588 00000 n >> >> /S /P /P 508 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R >> /StructParents 11 /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /Rotate 0 /Parent 8 0 R endobj 438 30 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << /Tabs /S /K 17 endobj 0000007338 00000 n /Tabs /S /S /P stream >> /K 14 >> << 262 0 obj 126 0 obj His argument is self-defeating. << /S /P /S /P /P 12 0 R Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. >> << /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) endobj << endobj /S /P /K 9 << /Rotate 0 endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 19 >> In the Motion, Presley seeks the entry of an order disqualifying and all co-counsel who represent Douglas Smith (Smith) and Carolina Preservation Properties, Inc. According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.6 The moving partys burden for a motion to disqualify is satisfied only when the motion to disqualify sets forth specific facts that point to a clear danger that either prejudices counsels client or his adversary.7. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 2 << endobj << endobj 111 0 obj /Pg 45 0 R /Annots [] As another court has observed "[t]he law does not liberally permit a defendant to call a prosecutor as a witness. [ii] However, an order is final and appealable when it disqualifies a law firm which has represented a defendant during the trial from continuing its representation during an appeal, due to a conflict created when an attorney who represented the . 243 0 R 244 0 R 245 0 R 246 0 R 247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R 251 0 R 252 0 R << >> >> /Pg 26 0 R 0 /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. /K 29 << << >> >> /Pg 32 0 R /K 36 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] /P 12 0 R /Kids [25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R] 82 0 obj Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. 238 0 obj /Tabs /S /S /Table endobj /Resources 432 0 R >> << /S /Link /P 529 0 R 197 0 obj /P 12 0 R 23 [152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R] 242 0 obj 123 0 obj Response to Motion to Disqualify Counsel and Law Firm [Doc. << >> << /Rotate 0 /Pg 36 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) >> 218 0 obj >> /Pg 45 0 R 23 0 obj /K 3 endobj << /A 526 0 R 244 0 obj /Resources 387 0 R endobj >> << /K [26 287 0 R 28] /Lang (EN-US) 2. 27 [165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R null 331 0 R null] /K 7 << United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] >> /P 133 0 R << << << /P 274 0 R /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] Rule 8.54. /Pg 44 0 R /K 10 endobj << /S /P 0000009036 00000 n endobj /P 506 0 R You are switching to another language. /Pg 20 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) >> << 67 0 obj /Annots [] /S /P endobj endobj at 391. /S /P /Resources 411 0 R The defendant's demand is presently under consideration by the Justice Department. << Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, and Carrie J. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, pursuant to this Court's October 12, 2022 order, hereby responds to Mr. Syed's motion to disqualify the Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the State of Maryland or strike the State as a party to the appeal and states as follows: I. 132 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /Annots [] endobj /S /P /S /P /S /H1 /P 123 0 R Brown v. Encompass Ins. 279 0 obj /K 3 /P 56 0 R /P 12 0 R 305 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Contents [479 0 R 480 0 R 481 0 R] >> 1 [233 0 R 234 0 R 235 0 R 236 0 R 237 0 R 238 0 R 239 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R endobj x+ | endobj endobj /P 12 0 R /Pg 31 0 R While the government takes exception to the defendant's statement of "facts" in his Motion, it is evident that neither prosecutor Rosman nor Sharp was a witness to any events that occurred on June 21, 1995, before they met with the defendant. /P 505 0 R << /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R 185 0 obj 206 0 obj /P 531 0 R /Lang (EN-US) +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Resources 474 0 R >> endobj He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002. >> endobj /P 302 0 R 91 0 obj /K 10 /S /P 34 0 obj endobj /Parent 3 0 R 201 0 obj /K 8 Dec. 10, 2014) (order disqualifying Jones Day), assets.law360news.com/ 0606000/606910/Celgard-LGC%20Order%20disqualifying%20 Jones%20Day.pdf. %PDF-1.7 % 255 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9A3F555EF45C79488712E0D1EABAE832>]/Index[233 34]/Info 232 0 R/Length 107/Prev 253809/Root 234 0 R/Size 267/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream /K 0 Under the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct (Colorado Rules or Colo. RCP), an attorney must safeguard client confidences and secrets, subject to a few exceptions. 167 0 obj /S /P /K 19 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] /StructParents 26 /Rotate 0 /K [50 299 0 R 52] 105 0 obj 129 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Annots [] 5 [73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 313 0 R 80 0 R /K 7 /Lang (EN-US) The defendant has moved to have prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp disqualified from conducting the trial in this matter due to the ethical prohibition against a lawyer conducting a trial in which he or she will be a necessary witness. 47 0 obj Tenorio moves to supplement his Response to the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment with two cases: Jordan v. /K 0 181 0 obj /P 12 0 R /K 11 >> On the contrary, a defendant must demonstrate a compelling and legitimate need to do so. >> /Filter /FlateDecode Mark White, Esq. >> /S /P /P 12 0 R 0 /P 529 0 R endobj endobj /Parent 3 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 531 0 R /K 0 endobj Disqualification motions implicate the most important duties that an attorney owes a client: the duties of confidentiality and loyalty. endobj 30 0 obj >> endobj LAi7p:0qX t` P7SP.X8v('bsX.LC8p) iV 3C4=H0u2Fd Cg. /Lang (EN-US) 311 0 obj /Annots [] /StructParents 3 In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. endobj /Pg 16 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 79 0 obj /Pg 42 0 R 8. << /K 9 A motion to disqualify should be made with "reasonable promptness" after the party becomes aware of the conflict so that it cannot be used as a strategic tool to deprive his opponent of counsel after a substantial amount of time has been spent on a case. /K 4 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /K 11 By far the majority of successful motions to disqualify are brought on the basis of a conflict of interest with a former or concurrent client or imputation, but attorneys should also be aware that successful motions to disqualify have been brought on the following bases, among others: (1) lawyer as witness, (2) appearance of impropriety, (3) receipt of confidential data, (4) personal interest, (5) violation of the no contact rules, and (6) misconduct with a witness. <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> /K 43 /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 29 0 R See People ex rel. << /Lang (EN-US) /S /H3 Typically, a former client seeking to disqualify a former attorney from representing an opposing party must identify specific, cogent information that the attorney possesses and show that the information is confidential and implicates the duty of loyalty. <> /Annots [] 11 0 obj 75 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R 287 0 obj >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] 32 [180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R] >> /Pg 17 0 R << >> /Contents [396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R] /K 4 /StructParents 12 /S /Reference /Lang (EN-US) /K 1 71 0 obj 196 0 obj 371 FILED 6/23/97. endobj /K 5 0000009454 00000 n >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 23 0 R /S /TOCI endobj /Parent 10 0 R endobj /StructParents 23 /S /P >> /Pg 45 0 R endobj 143 0 obj >> 98 0 obj >> endobj /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj /Pg 17 0 R endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) >> /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) endobj 2022 California Rules of Court. 321 0 obj /K 14 /K 2 /P 506 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << See, e.g., People v. Shari, 204 P.3d 453, 457 (Colo. 2009) (distinguishing between duties to current clients under Colo. RPC 1.7 and to former clients under Colo. RPC 1.9). >> /S /P /Pg 15 0 R (See Defendant's Motion Exhibit 2.) /S /Reference Once the above requirements are met, the judge must enter an order granting disqualification if the motion to disqualify is "legally sufficient.". /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) 6:12-cv-01293-NAM-TWD (N.D.N.Y. 334 0 obj endobj endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /Pg 44 0 R 11. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 194 0 obj /K 5 endobj /StructParents 14 259 0 obj Occasionally a Motion, Opposition, or . << /K 5 >> /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R << /K 10 /Rotate 0 /S /P >> RESPONSE TO SOME SPECIFIC CLAIMS OF IMPROPRIETY IN THE MOTION TO DISQUALIFY (1) THE CLAIM: Special Counsel breached confidentiality by allowing a DMS employee to be present for sworn testimony of numerous witnesses. However, as cited in Respondents' brief, there are specific provisions of the Washington constitution, state statutes, and case law regarding representation of the Insurance 12. /S /P /S /Link /K 16 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 3 12 0 obj /P 531 0 R /P 12 0 R << >> /S /P /K 4 /K 0 endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj /Pg 28 0 R /K 2 81 0 R 314 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R] 199 0 obj >> << /K 13 /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << >> << 225 0 obj >> /S /P /Pg 38 0 R << An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. /P 123 0 R /Pg 17 0 R endobj /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S His Application was transferred to the Court of Criminal Appeals on February 22, 2002. /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 133 0 R >> >> >> 359 0 obj /P 505 0 R endobj Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 30 49 0 obj 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . /S /P >> 325 0 obj 3 0 obj He also made /Kids [40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R] 103 0 obj 349 0 obj << >> endobj endobj /StructParents 34 << /Pg 41 0 R >> /StructParents 9 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << /Pg 20 0 R As the Colorado Supreme Court has noted, [v]iolation of an ethical rule, in itself, is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for disqualification, although there typically must be evidence of a violation or potential violation of attorney ethical proscriptions, such as those centered on the duties of loyalty and fairness or those intended to protect the integrity of the process. For the reasons that follow, the two motions to disqualify are denied, and the motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. >> << 1. endobj >> /P 12 0 R endobj >> >> >> >> /Parent 11 0 R /K 9 /P 508 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 44 0 R 18 0 obj 12 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R] /StructParents 27 /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R ), aff'd, 979 F.2d 912 (2d Cir. /K 20 /K 1 308 0 obj 1992)). << 26 0 obj /P 12 0 R << /Pg 17 0 R 40 326 0 R 41 329 0 R 42 330 0 R] /S /P /Tabs /S << /P 509 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) >> /S /H3 /K 31 /S /P endobj CV1810311PADFMX, 2020 WL 2374947 (C.D. /P 12 0 R /K 4 << 317 0 obj endobj /S /P endobj /Tabs /S /DropCap /Figure /Contents [364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R] 21 0 obj /K 2 << /K [6 277 0 R 8] /S /TOCI /K 0 endobj >> endobj << /K 1 1985) (finding defendant had a compelling need for prosecutor's testimony when that testimony was the only source of vital evidence). >> << /S /H2 /Lang (EN-US) /S /H3 /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> >> << endobj /P 56 0 R /S /P /Kids [20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R 23 0 R 24 0 R] << endobj 314 0 obj 211 0 obj /S /Sect 27 0 obj /P 509 0 R Official websites use .gov 78 0 obj /K 7 /S /P /S /Table /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /K 1 >> 346 0 obj 330 0 obj endobj Sharp was sent via Federal Express this day of June, 1997, to: J. {{ ! endobj /P 12 0 R /S /P /P 505 0 R 94 0 obj /P 55 0 R /P 294 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 19 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K 0 endobj /P 12 0 R >> /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 24 endobj /MarkInfo 2 0 R /K [42 295 0 R 44] /S /P /Pg 16 0 R /Parent 8 0 R Co. v. Isham, 782 F.Supp. 277 0 obj >> endobj /Pg 15 0 R 337 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] endobj endobj Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al. /K 4 /P 509 0 R /Contents [384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R] endobj /S /P endobj Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing /K [9 309 0 R 11] << at 390-91. /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] << >> 289 0 obj >> /Parent 8 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) This sample opposition to California motion to vacate judgment with an attorney affidavit of fault is used to oppose a motion made under the mandatory attorney affidavit of fault provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 473 (b) on several grounds including that the motion is untimely, does not include the required attorney affidavit of endobj /Count 5 A motion is a document asking the court to order something in an existing case. 147 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 0000005497 00000 n /K 9 /S /P /Tabs /S /S /Link /Lang (EN-US) Unsolicited emails and other information sent to Dentons will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. 5 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R endobj /K 4 189 0 obj /K 3 >> >> /Tabs /S 345 0 obj /Tabs /S /K 1 endobj << /Pg 45 0 R Disqualification motions put these obligations directly at issue. Mar. 230 0 obj 36 319 0 R 37 320 0 R 38 321 0 R 39 325 0 R /P 531 0 R << << >> /K 13 `%qs2"Z(-> ^eZAst`zqz~5{=rvvl6r7rhi_WSztQa%_`e.~QFCPN!Px:v7Pp}VDl|RUjND,a5KFVo}W4+7H/)fJ%o5mgS9BFcQ7HP13+Fxk{N25 wx7O)&[ /iCw %Fk|7on6 r9rH_wFS&`E9T8`jPDlm(n /K 12 /P 12 0 R /K 51 >> 330 0 R 162 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 18 0 R endobj endobj /Rotate 0 are satisfied. endobj /K 2 v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., No. /Rotate 0 << endobj << << endobj 137 0 obj << >> 133 0 obj 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /P 290 0 R /S /P /K 16 /Endnote /Note /S /P /P 12 0 R /Pg 22 0 R << >> 267 0 obj >> 271 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R 69 0 obj /Contents [433 0 R 434 0 R 435 0 R] << << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) 240 0 obj 220 0 obj /S /P /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 12 0 R /P 505 0 R 28 [169 0 R 170 0 R] << /Pg 16 0 R /S /P 257 0 obj /Pg 45 0 R << /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). >> << /Pg 16 0 R motion to disqualify. << /Lang (EN-US) although Comment 3 to that Rule provides some context: Matters are substantially related for purposes of this Rule if they involve the same transaction or legal dispute or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the clients position in the subsequent matter.